Organodynamics | Grant
Holland, Apr 25, 2014 |
Slide: Tractability and Organodynamic Modeling | |
Tractability and complexity are clearly issues with organodynamic modeling: á
Enumerating
the sample points (organizations) á
Articulating
each as an extended topology á
Forming
the joint distribution (OPDs) á
Assigning
the simple and joint distributions (ODPDs) á
Defining
the Markov processes (ODSPs) Organodynamics
efforts to respect the ontology
(fundamental nature) of the systems it models: As organizations
of interrelationships. Because they ARE organizations, not numbers or vectors. A biological cell IS a set of interrelationships. It HAS many attributes, some of which are numerical. Modeling target systems as organizations is more complex than modeling them as vectors of numbers (manifolds). | Model
Fidelity Models
exist to enhance intellectual accessibility while conserving salient
features. They
must hit a midpoint between two extremes: 1.
If
too complex, a model loses intellectual accessibility. 2.
If
too simple, it can fail to conserve salient features. The
target systems that organodynamics seeks to model are extraordinarily complex. Hitting this midpoint remains highly complex. Organodynamic models should be Òas simple as possible, but no simpler.Ó |
Incremental
Modeling: á
Course Graining á
Theoretical Probability Assignments á
Theoretical
Probability Refinements | Organodynamics is not alone in facing seemingly-intractable modeling challenges: Statistical mechanics faced many of the same issues. Many of the incremental modeling approaches mentioned in the previous panel are taken from statistical mechanics. |
Notes: